diff --git a/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268 b/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0df5a6e --- /dev/null +++ b/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268 @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +{ + "comments": [ + { + "unresolved": true, + "key": { + "uuid": "32982b65_a63335f8", + "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL", + "patchSetId": 1 + }, + "lineNbr": 0, + "author": { + "id": 32832 + }, + "writtenOn": "2024-01-15T05:41:31Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "Hi, Vefa and architects: \n I\u0027m fine with the spec. \n I have a question here which might be not necessary for the spec, but is important for our kernel developing process on this upgrading. From my work by now, I found this kernel upgrading can cause some user interface changes (e.g. attribute files change under proc/ sys/ ...) and they will cause jenkins installation failures. Those issues need to be solved or located by wrcp framework. Then it is a problem how kernel and framework work together. If we merge kernel first, it will cause broken installation. If we merge all the changes together, it will involve a mass of patches from different developers.\n Do you have any idea about how we deal with this? Will it be OK if we use a temp branch for those repos of this upgrading and merge them back when all the work finished?\n Thanks.", + "revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268", + "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543" + }, + { + "unresolved": false, + "key": { + "uuid": "682aa0e0_e25da0c8", + "filename": "doc/source/specs/stx-10.0/approved/os-2011000-uprevision-kernel-to-v6.6.rst", + "patchSetId": 1 + }, + "lineNbr": 264, + "author": { + "id": 32832 + }, + "writtenOn": "2024-01-15T05:41:31Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "we are expecting this spec for drivers.", + "range": { + "startLine": 262, + "startChar": 25, + "endLine": 264, + "endChar": 29 + }, + "revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268", + "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543" + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file