diff --git a/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268 b/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268
index 93e933a..fea8e18 100644
--- a/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268
+++ b/8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268
@@ -69,6 +69,41 @@
       "revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     },
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "03f103cb_b8516898",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 33377
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-01-23T14:00:30Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Hi all,\n\nI started a discussion (admittedly internal to Wind River) regarding the feasibility of creating a StarlingX integration branch for the kernel upgrade activity. After about a week of waiting, I learned that the effort required for creating an integration branch is not prohibitive (likely a day\u0027s worth of work). I have not received negative or positive comments, however.\n\nIf the reviewers of this proposal find it beneficial, I can update the specification proposal to note that the use of an integration branch has been under consideration. Until then, I would like to \u0027resolve\u0027 this thread.\n\nThank you,\n\nVefa",
+      "parentUuid": "38913b18_b54ee416",
+      "revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "e65589e8_18d85480",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 33377
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-01-23T14:00:30Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Hi all,\n\nMy understanding is that we need another vote for the approval of this specification proposal to reach a simple majority (3 approvals out of 4 possible approvers):\n\nhttps://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/house.html#specs-approval\nhttps://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/\n\nIs there any chance that another Technical Steering Committee (TSC) member could review this specification proposal?\n\nThank you,\n\nVefa",
+      "revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
     {
       "unresolved": false,
       "key": {