Update patch set 3
Patch Set 3: (3 comments) Patch-set: 3 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 35230 \u003c35230@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_31954\u003e replied on the change"} Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 31954 \u003c31954@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_31954\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1f13ef205
commit
1604710f55
|
@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "d6cd1862_77a9ea2b",
|
||||
"filename": "/COMMIT_MSG",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 12,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 31954
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-05-06T15:36:59Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Did we verify adding the subclouds w/o OpenStack endpoints created on the system controller? What\u0027s the plan to remove the endpoint?",
|
||||
"revId": "63b72d9ea542d10ceebf4f09441dd9b59ae29755",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "f01f1c1d_47f95571",
|
||||
"filename": "distributedcloud/dccommon/endpoint_cache.py",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 313,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 31954
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-05-06T15:36:59Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Any consideration of not moving the two methods into the class? Can we have some unit test against these simple methods?",
|
||||
"revId": "63b72d9ea542d10ceebf4f09441dd9b59ae29755",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "905f5b3c_2086214a",
|
||||
"filename": "distributedcloud/dccommon/endpoint_cache.py",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 662,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 31954
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-05-06T15:36:59Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Can we combine the none client and the token expiry case together as they are both doing the creation?",
|
||||
"revId": "63b72d9ea542d10ceebf4f09441dd9b59ae29755",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue