Update patch set 2

Patch Set 2:

(4 comments)

Patch-set: 2
Label: Verified=0

79a8d6abf7d4e23cf62855e592834e3c48fad5a4

@@ -1,5 +1,56 @@
 {
   "comments": [
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3f79a3b5_2f5d6747",
+        "filename": "specs/STX_Example_Spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 124,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 970
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2018-10-02T12:39:22Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "trailing whitespace",
+      "revId": "79a8d6abf7d4e23cf62855e592834e3c48fad5a4",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3f79a3b5_0f898bc5",
+        "filename": "specs/STX_Example_Spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 172,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 970
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2018-10-02T12:39:22Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "This section is pretty specific to Nova, so we have a similar concept in StarlingX?",
+      "revId": "79a8d6abf7d4e23cf62855e592834e3c48fad5a4",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3f79a3b5_efa44f4e",
+        "filename": "specs/STX_Example_Spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 238,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 970
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2018-10-02T12:39:22Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Nova still attempts to maintain some level of support for continuous deployment although support for that is slipping.  Does StarlingX want this?",
+      "revId": "79a8d6abf7d4e23cf62855e592834e3c48fad5a4",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "3f79a3b5_f4b18246",
@@ -17,6 +68,23 @@
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
       "unresolved": false
     },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3f79a3b5_0f774bd3",
+        "filename": "specs/STX_Example_Spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 315,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 970
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2018-10-02T12:39:22Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Is tempest something that is used for any of the StarlingX services?  Do we want to do that if not?  We can leave out tempest references if we\u0027re not using it beyond running against the stx OpenStack builds.",
+      "revId": "79a8d6abf7d4e23cf62855e592834e3c48fad5a4",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    },
     {
       "key": {
         "uuid": "3f79a3b5_d4d48649",