Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (2 comments) Patch-set: 1 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 33377 \u003c33377@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_33377\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
c1ff8a2b80
commit
e67e49659c
|
@ -69,6 +69,41 @@
|
|||
"revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "03f103cb_b8516898",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 33377
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-01-23T14:00:30Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Hi all,\n\nI started a discussion (admittedly internal to Wind River) regarding the feasibility of creating a StarlingX integration branch for the kernel upgrade activity. After about a week of waiting, I learned that the effort required for creating an integration branch is not prohibitive (likely a day\u0027s worth of work). I have not received negative or positive comments, however.\n\nIf the reviewers of this proposal find it beneficial, I can update the specification proposal to note that the use of an integration branch has been under consideration. Until then, I would like to \u0027resolve\u0027 this thread.\n\nThank you,\n\nVefa",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "38913b18_b54ee416",
|
||||
"revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "e65589e8_18d85480",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 33377
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-01-23T14:00:30Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Hi all,\n\nMy understanding is that we need another vote for the approval of this specification proposal to reach a simple majority (3 approvals out of 4 possible approvers):\n\nhttps://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/house.html#specs-approval\nhttps://docs.starlingx.io/governance/reference/tsc/\n\nIs there any chance that another Technical Steering Committee (TSC) member could review this specification proposal?\n\nThank you,\n\nVefa",
|
||||
"revId": "8d05288efa59f8bcf1e9230bb4e68e1abceb1268",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue